[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LI] Message from RMS.

To: raju@xxxxxxx, Raj Mathur <raju@xxxxxxx>, Atul Chitnis <achitnis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
From: Dakshinamurthy Karra <kd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 00:55:47 -0800
Cc: Linux India General List <linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <199912041843.AAA21922@bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com>
Organization: Subex Systems Ltd.
References: <199912041252.SAA20984@bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912041921280.1775-100000@cix.exocore.com> <199912041843.AAA21922@bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 04 Dec 1999, Raj Mathur wrote:
> In other words, you admit the folly of your ways :-) Great, I'm glad
> someone saw the light because of me!
> 
Keeping the discussion without making comments on individuals make us all more
comfortable in taking part in discussion ;-)
> It's never too late to GPL.  The excuses you give for not GPL'ing a
> software which is completely your product (IRIX has source from over
> 100 different companies in it) could be subject to the same adverb
> that you are using :-)
> 
Hmm... does it really? I think GPL or any other form of license (including
distributing only binaries) is the prerogative of the developer.

-- KD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
  - From: Raj Mathur

References:
- Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
  - From: Raj Mathur
- Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
  - From: Atul Chitnis
- Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
  - From: Raj Mathur

Prev by Subject: Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
Next by Subject: Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
Previous by thread: Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
Next by thread: Re: [LI] Message from RMS.
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread