[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<

To: linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
From: C Hanish Menon <hanish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 11:20:03 +0530
In-reply-to: <99120519472000.00775@hankvc.kvctek.com>
References: <2962A018DE14D211B8620000F80807F4F90596@IE10-VSN.hiso.honeywell.com> <38466ACE.FB84E7A6@wipsys.soft.net> <99120519472000.00775@hankvc.kvctek.com>
Reply-to: linux-india
Sender: owner-linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi

> (Well almost). When the Sun based year calculation was made the basis
> by Julius Caeser (I suppose) it was thought that it takes 356 days

Well HUMAN IS TO ERR
Sorry for this stupid mistake of 356 days per year.

---------
Keep :-)
HanishKVC
http://hanishkvc.tripod.com/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.

References:
- [LI] Interesting error on unix
  - From: Guruprasad, Mahendrakar V (IE10)
- Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix: Answer
  - From: Nadeem Khan
- Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
  - From: C Hanish Menon

Prev by Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Next by Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Previous by thread: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Next by thread: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread