[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<

To: linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
From: Rohit <rohits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 20:12:41 +0530
References: <2962A018DE14D211B8620000F80807F4F90596@IE10-VSN.hiso.honeywell.com> <38466ACE.FB84E7A6@wipsys.soft.net> <99120519472000.00775@hankvc.kvctek.com>
Reply-to: linux-india
Sender: owner-linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Actualy speaking its again not 356 1/4 exactly. Thats why one as the Centinal
> rule, where a centinal year has to be divisible by 400 to be a leap year. This
> again misses by a FEW SECONDS each year.

Right. A year = 365.2422 days, to be precise siderially.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.

References:
- [LI] Interesting error on unix
  - From: Guruprasad, Mahendrakar V (IE10)
- Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix: Answer
  - From: Nadeem Khan
- Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
  - From: C Hanish Menon

Prev by Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Next by Subject: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Previous by thread: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Next by thread: Re: [LI] Interesting error on unix >> Perfection of Solar calender Over TIME <<
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread