[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: VSNL as compared to other ISPs
Kingsly John rearranged electrons thusly:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> |ISPs seems to indicate otherwise. I'm able to hold a connect much more
> |stably with any of the other 3 ISPs than with VSNL. What gives ? Does
> |anybody else have the same experience to report ?
FUBAR'ed RAS / dialin server implementation, likely. Other ISPs (such as
TringTring, which I was idiot enough to try, even though I saw the "division
of APTECH" clearly in the ads) have the same problem (along with various other
problems of course)
> I get fantastic connects and speeds with VSNL the only problem that i'm
> facing is that i'm unable to access certain sites when I'm assigned
> certain IP addresses(and that is MOST of the time)
Routing hassles? Are those IPs you are assigned out of the same C block? Or
from various blocks scattered around vsnl's dialup pool? It _could_ be a
routing issue at VSNL, or it could be that VSNL is playing censor (they do
their clumsy best to filter pakistani sites, net2phone etc)
> I have major problems connecting to satyam... because their ras servers
> are not uniform some do PAP some do user-pass yet others do login-pass..
wvdial seems to handle it very well, from what I can see
> Dishnet sucks... u get disconnected so very often I feel they do it on
> purpose. (Even Caltiger is better than them!!)
caltiger doesnt work on linux unfortunately (or at least their ad-bar doesnt).
> Sigma online was really great !! I used them for a little over 100
> hours... great service great helpdesk!
Hmmmm... in Bangalore you say? If they are the same outfit that's in Hyd'bad
they are pretty good.
Suresh Ramasubramanian <--> mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin