Re: RHL versions that support FAT.

[Pankaj Kaushal <apenguinhead@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Bhummanjot S. Talwar" wrote:
> 
> I read somewhere that in the earlier stages of the RHL development it
> supported the FAT partition but then later that support was removed and now
> it's back there in the current release.
> 
> Can anyone send me the real numbers, the versions that support FAT ?
i belive M$ sued ppl who were devlopin yhe fat n' vfat
support and later they withdrew the case.

---
...............................................
   The only "intuitive" interface is a nipple.
   After that, it's all learned.
 
 Committed to freedom and diversity 
 Pankaj Kaushal <pankaj@xxxxxxx> 

 //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/) 
 \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com