Re: [LI] Re: Buggy RH 6.1 (attn Atul)

["VaibhaV Sharma" <dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I really suggest the people having problems to read the PCQ Mag. which
accompanied the RH6.1 CD or should I say the CD accompanied the Mag.
anyway....

You can clearly make out the amount of last minute efforts put in by the
team to bring to us the LATEST that was available(RH6.1) ...... and not
giving us something that was now old (RH6.0)

** Am I correct with this Atul ?? **

As for the accompanying software in /pcq.... I think u can compromise for
not downloading those hefty tar.tgz files urself and then realising that
they are incomplete.

I think we (or atleast some of us OR atleast mee) still are lucky to have
the PCQ initiative with us to provide the material because of which almost
all of us are here on this list today, discussing the problems etc....

Atleast I (or anyone else) was never flamed by anyone whome I have
helped....even if I gave some incorrect solution (which can be considered
beta) to any problem. Then why should PCQ team be blamed for providing some
beta (or whatever) things.....

Flames, comments, suggestions, love letters welcome....

VaibhaV Sharma
Indian Linux Users Group Indore Chapter

-------------------------------------
Jab gaon mein pachas-pachas network hop door baccha kisi Software ka crack
mangta hai to uski maa kehati hai, `So jaa, bete, so jaa, nahin to Nasscom
se Dewang Mehta aa jayega'.

Thats why folks, Join the free software Revolution. Use Linux.
-------------------------------------


----- Original Message -----
From: Atul Chitnis <achitnis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LI] Re: Buggy RH 6.1 (attn Atul)


> On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Anand Singh Bisen wrote:
>
> > I completely give you guys credit to start the Linux revolution in
> > india and i really thank your team, but there is a problem with you
> > guys if you take the responsibility of making a good project then why
> > do you guys run away or try to give lame excuses for small faults
> > which might have been made by anybody.
>
> Run away? Lame excuses? My, aren't we hell bent on blaming *someone* here?
> ;-)
>
> If there is something wrong with whatever you installed out of /pcq, it
> has nothing to do with RedHat Linux 6.1. And we have at no time said that
> there are no problems with the software we supplied under /pcq/goodies.
> The software we supplied is what we got off the Internet, from as
> impeccable sources as we could determine (usually the original author's
> site). If you have an issue with that software, why don't you take it up
> with the people who wrote it? Or download the sources and fix it yourself?
> But why this tirade against PC Quest? You are shooting the messenger!
>
> > Ok then this means that if it is proved that the PCQ RH6.1 is buggy
> > then you and your team are at a fault not RedHat ok !
>
> Saying "OK" doesn't make it so.
>
> Your entire tirade was basically your attempt at proving something or
> someone to be bad. Not exactly the most positive of approaches.
>
> If you are so upset, I strongly advise you to make use of the Linux Money
> Back Guarantee.
>
> Or wait for February 17th, install Windows 2000, and then *honestly* tell
> us that you had no problems.
>
> If you would like to discuss this further, please do so in private mail.
>
> Atul
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
> the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
> to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.