Re: [LI] Re: Buggy RH 6.1 (attn Atul)

[Atul Chitnis <achitnis@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Anand Singh Bisen wrote:

> I completely give you guys credit to start the Linux revolution in
> india and i really thank your team, but there is a problem with you
> guys if you take the responsibility of making a good project then why
> do you guys run away or try to give lame excuses for small faults
> which might have been made by anybody.

Run away? Lame excuses? My, aren't we hell bent on blaming *someone* here?
;-)

If there is something wrong with whatever you installed out of /pcq, it
has nothing to do with RedHat Linux 6.1. And we have at no time said that
there are no problems with the software we supplied under /pcq/goodies.
The software we supplied is what we got off the Internet, from as
impeccable sources as we could determine (usually the original author's
site). If you have an issue with that software, why don't you take it up
with the people who wrote it? Or download the sources and fix it yourself?
But why this tirade against PC Quest? You are shooting the messenger!

> Ok then this means that if it is proved that the PCQ RH6.1 is buggy
> then you and your team are at a fault not RedHat ok !

Saying "OK" doesn't make it so. 

Your entire tirade was basically your attempt at proving something or
someone to be bad. Not exactly the most positive of approaches.

If you are so upset, I strongly advise you to make use of the Linux Money
Back Guarantee. 

Or wait for February 17th, install Windows 2000, and then *honestly* tell
us that you had no problems.

If you would like to discuss this further, please do so in private mail.

Atul


--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.