Re: Reg Intel Processors

[Prakash Advani <prakash@xxxxxxxxxx>]

There was no difference between the 486 SX and DX except that in the SX
the co-processor was disabled internally. It was just an Intel strategy
to have control over the low end market.

Regards
Prakash

Raj Mathur wrote:
> 
> Uh, wasn't the difference between the 486 SX and DX that the one
> didn't have a built-in maths coproc, while the other did?
> 
> -- Raju
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information on Linux in India visit http://www.linux-india.org/
> Linux India is NOT a forum for Microsoft/India/Pakistan/US/UK bashing.
> Flame baits will not be tolerated.  If you can appreciate satire read
> http://www.templetons.com/brad/emily.html

- -- 
Prakash Advani 			http://www.yoom.com/prakash	
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Email: prakash@xxxxxxxxxx	ICQ: 4872876
US Fax: +1 (781) 623-8454 	Pager:(9122)96223022222
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.freeos.com - Resource Center for Free Operating Systems



- --------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux in India visit http://www.linux-india.org/
Linux India is NOT a forum for Microsoft/India/Pakistan/US/UK bashing.
Flame baits will not be tolerated.  If you can appreciate satire read
http://www.templetons.com/brad/emily.html

------------------------------