Re: Re: Re: Re: The LUGs in India

[Sunil Thomas Thonikuzhiyil <suniltt@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:46:47AM +0530, Atul Chitnis wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, RaghuNath L wrote:
> When the split Cochin-LUG matter came up, I wrote to Arun and Thaths. I
> got no suggestions/recommendations, so I did what I deemed to be the
> fairest way of handling things.

     But you did not inform us ( ilug cochin ) that we are taken off.


> At no time did I point the DNS entry at any faction's page. I just set up
> a neutral page and pointed to the mailing list. I *removed* the entry only
> when the "gentleman" from Cochin tried to gain political milage out of
> this.

  As a spectator to the on going dispute and as a member of ILUG cochin
I would like to point out a few things . There is nothing like two factions
in I-LUG cochin. Of course we have  differences of opinion and we have
every right for that.  The problems started when a few of the
luggies(including our coordinator ) here  left for bangalore . 
Even after repeated requests the control of our mailing list was not
transferred to our present coordinator.

   At prsenet  there is no faction here .We are a group here like any
other LUG. The so called faction  is a few members located at bangalore
who want to remote administer things here. 
      The issues raised by ragOO still stand irrespective of Atuls attempts to
absolve himself. 
  
Sunil
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sunil Thomas Thonikuzhiyil               sunil_tt@xxxxxxxxx
 Principal, College of Applied Science    On  Debian 2.2
 Calicut,Kerala,India. Ph:0495-768320     http://geocities.com/sunil_tt
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
x