Re: Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details

["Rahul Jindal" <rahulj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

your good job starting showing already. thanks :)

r /\ |-| |_| |_
==================
First, they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they fight you.
Then you win -- MG
==================

The Northern Linux lug-northindia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sudhakar Chandra" <thaths@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [LIG] Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details


> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:37:53PM +0530, did Suresh Ramasubramanian
write:
> > Sudhakar Chandra rearranged electrons thusly:
> > > I'm looking into it.  The problem is I do not see white_falcon as
being
> > > subscribed to the list.  And the headers in bounced messages do not
contain
> > > info on which address is actually subscribed to the list.
> > Thaths - first, call up namezero / or rather their mailhost criticalpath
/
> > cp.net (which is in SFO).
> > Call their abuse desk  and ask if they can fix their broken MTA.  That
seems
> > to be rewriting return-paths (not just ignoring them and delivering
bounces
> > to the from address).
>
> Here is what I did:
>
> 1. Got the list of email addresses subscribed to LIG.  Some regular
> expression magic to eliminate the names and just retain the domain names.
>
> 2. uniq and sort the list.
>
> 3. go through the list and run /usr/bin/mx on it to see the MX server.
>
> 4. Grep for namezero and voila!
>
> 5. rm the offending user.
>
> Thaths
>
> --
> pub  1024R/9B7FE6BD 1998-03-25 Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <thaths@xxxxxxxxx>
> Key fingerprint = 8A 84 2E 67 10 9A 64 03  24 38 B6 AB 1B 6E 8C E4
> uid                            Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
<thaths@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> An alpha version of a web based tool to manage
> your subscription with this mailing list is at
> http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
>