[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

[OT] Re: borland spam

To: lig <linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OT] Re: borland spam
From: "Binand Raj S." <binand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 23:26:32 +0530
In-reply-to: <20010217094208.A21368@alice.bombay.retortsoft.com>; from amarg@bombay.retortsoft.com on Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 09:42:09AM +0530
Mail-followup-to: lig <linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010216171306.01e7bd20@202.54.12.17> <14989.22774.308287.830854@localhost.localdomain> <20010217094208.A21368@alice.bombay.retortsoft.com>
Reply-to: binand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

Amarendra GODBOLE forced the electrons to say:
> Also, clever spammers add a note to the bottom of the mail, quoting a 
> law in the U.S., stating that this cannot be considered as a SPAM ...
> balh ... it is a one time mail ... balh ... blah ...
> ** NO such "one time email" law exists. **

Even if such a law existed, it is not applicable to *me*, as an Indian
citizen, residing in India - I am not governed by US laws. And to you
too - if you are also an Indian citizen residing in India.

Binand

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Re: borland spam
  - From: Suresh Ramasubramanian

References:
- borland spam
  - From: Udhay Shankar N
- borland spam
  - From: Raju Mathur
- Re: borland spam
  - From: Amarendra GODBOLE

Prev by Subject: [ot] Re: [linux mirrors in India]
Next by Subject: Re: [OT] Re: borland spam
Previous by thread: Re: borland spam
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Re: borland spam
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread