Re: Inaccurate reporting on GPL

[Raju Mathur <raju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oops, my fault I missed the exact violation.

Anyway, turning non-GPL software into GPL isn't such a Bad Thing now,
is it? ;-)

Regards,

-- Raju

>>>>> "Arun" == Arun Sharma <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Arun> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:12:09AM +0530, Raju Mathur wrote:
    >> Where's the violation?  Making a GPL infrastructure to plug
    >> commercial modules into is perfectly legal, otherwise people
    >> wouldn't be able to make binary-only drivers/modules for Linux.

    Arun> I meant GPL violation in a different sense :) - assuming
    Arun> that all software in the world is GPL'ed by default, even
    Arun> when it isn't. This is the second flagrant misrepresentation
    Arun> that I've seen in the last month. First tucows.com called
    Arun> BSD to be GPL'ed. Now linuxplanet calls this mailer GPL'ed
    Arun> when it isn't.

    Arun> 	-Arun
-- 
Raju Mathur          raju@xxxxxxxxxxxxx           http://kandalaya.org/