[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free software, proprietary software and Stalin
>>"Arun" == Arun Sharma <adsharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Arun> GNU ideology explicitly advocates destroying commercial software. This
Arun> is where the hypocrisy comes in.
Rubbish. Please quote chapter and verse about where anyone
talks about destroying commercial software. You are just
displaying your lack of understanding of the arguments that
the free software community embraces.
The argument always has been that software ownership is an
idea that is detr4imental to society in general, and thus one should
work towards getting the laws and rules changed. Most of the
arguments are to support this.
Arun> On second thoughts, hypocrisy is too strong a word - I should've used
Arun> contradiction.
There is no contradiction ivolved -- I strogly suggest you go
read www.gnu.org.
Once you have done that, perhaps we can have a more rational
discussion, but at this moment you are massively confused about the
viewpoint that you oppose.
manoj
--
A study of the science of technology defines what is possible; a
study of the economics of technology establishes which of the
possibilities is practical and useful. -- Montgomery Phister
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C