[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux and Java--a tale of two revolutions
Java's write-once-deploy-anywhere is very attractive to people.
Combine that with the magic of OOP (it's still magic, even if it sucks
unless you're really good at design), and you have a winning
combination in the market. Now if only Netscape had embedded Perl as
a VM instead of Java, we could have been breaking new barriers
everyday. But Java? Bah, it's too restrictive, it's too slow, it's
too controlled for a freedom-loving person (some may read
``anarchist'' here) like me. One of the reasons I never took up
Pascal actually -- I want a language which lets me make mistakes if I
want to, not one which molly-coddles me... I already have a Mother
:-)
Regards,
-- Raju
>>>>> "Arun" == Arun Sharma <adsharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Arun> On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 05:53:08PM +0530, Atul Chitnis
Arun> wrote:
>> Good stuff about why Linux will win, and Java may not.
>>
>> http://www.ciol.com/content/columns/lastword/99121501.asp
Arun> But some things just defy logic - I'm a Java hater, because
Arun> I don't believe that programming it is any easier than
Arun> writing C/C++ code and I have to pay a huge performance and
Arun> memory footprint penalty.
Arun> But what worries me is the army of new developers coming out
Arun> of schools from their object oriented programming classes,
Arun> who just love Java.
Arun> The place where it has really succeeded is the server side
Arun> business logic aka application server market. No one writes
Arun> C/C++ code there. And there is a noticable move away from
Arun> CGI and perl in that market at the high end.
Arun> -Arun