[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LIH] mutt problem

To: LIH <linux-india-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LIH] mutt problem
From: "Binand Raj S." <binand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 01:46:40 +0530
Cc: LD <linux-delhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010315163939.A26452@RH62WS>; from suresh-grl@eth.net on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 04:39:39PM -0500
Mail-followup-to: LIH <linux-india-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LD <linux-delhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20010315163939.A26452@RH62WS>
Reply-to: binand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.16i

V.Suresh forced the electrons to say:
> In mutt, when I write mails, the user-defined headers are there. But
> when I send the mail, the user defined headers aren't sent. What could
> be the reason?

Friend,

If you are talking about the headers OS: and MUA: that you wanted to be
sent, they reached me perfectly. Here is what I got:

OS: Linux 2.2.16
MUA: Mutt 1.2.5i, Fully Loaded!

3 points I'd like to add:

1. User defined headers should be prefixed with X-.
2. Mutt default installation sends a User-Agent: header. So, no need to
   add that MUA: header of yours.
3. Don't underestimate mutt - it is the greatest MUA that has been
   designed ever.

Binand [your personal mutt support engineer - on LIH]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: [LIH] mutt problem
  - From: Pankaj Kaushal

References:
- mutt problem
  - From: V.Suresh

Prev by Subject: Re: [LIH] Mutt doubts ( Four in all :-) )
Next by Subject: Re: Re: [LIH] mutt problem
Previous by thread: Re: mutt problem
Next by thread: Re: Re: [LIH] mutt problem
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread