[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
My PIII/550, 512KB cache, 128MB RAM does a work unit in approx. 8
hours if left undisturbed. Look at secondary cache -- that makes a
big difference in the processing speed. cat /proc/cpuinfo
Client is: setiathome-2.4.i386-pc-linux-gnu-gnulibc2.1
>>>>> "Vipul" == Vipul Mathur <vipul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Vipul> Mrinal Kalakrishnan <mrinal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Vipul Mathur typed: > I just happend to note that you are
>> averaging about 12hrs per work unit. > I'm curious, can you
>> tell me what hardware config you are using? I use a > PIII
>> 700MHz system with 64MB ram and average 16 hrs per unit!!
>> This is an absolute shock to me, and will be to you as
>> well. This is the configuration of my system: Celeron 300A (no
>> overclocking), 64Mb of RAM. :-)
>> I don't understand how your performance could be so low!!
>> You *are* using the linux client right? Cheers..
>> Mrinal Kalakrishnan <mrinal@xxxxxxxxx> http://mrinal.dhs.org/
Vipul> Yes I'm shocked, and yes I am using the
Vipul> i686-pc-linux-gnulibc1-static client.
Vipul> I'm cc'ing to list so that someone can hopefully shed some
Vipul> light on this. Raju, Neil what do you ppl have to say
Vipul> about this??
Vipul> Could the members pf Linux-India (SETI@home group) please
Vipul> post their system config, client version and average hours
Vipul> per work unit (on the mentioned hardware) to this list?