[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: printf vs printk

To: linux-india-programmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: printf vs printk
From: Arun Sharma <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:43:13 -0800
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103091252360.17067-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:58:49PM +0530
References: <3AA87E83.B18EEABB@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103091252360.17067-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:58:49PM +0530, Alex M Alex wrote:
> 
> hi all,
>         I was not able to understand
>         the funda on printf vs printk(WHY???)

Because the kernel is not linked to libc, it can't use printf.
Printk is a simplified clone.

	-Arun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: printf vs printk
  - From: Santosh Singh

References:
- why goto ?
  - From: Anurag Shekhar
- printf vs printk
  - From: Alex M Alex

Prev by Subject: printf vs printk
Next by Subject: Re: printf vs printk
Previous by thread: Messages
Next by thread: Re: printf vs printk
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread