[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: shared memory

To: linux-india-programmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: shared memory
From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:18:00 -0700
In-reply-to: <DB9494CB877DD411BA0C00D0B73C6D24318B60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Sachin.Shurpali@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 06:33:56PM +0200
References: <DB9494CB877DD411BA0C00D0B73C6D24318B60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 06:33:56PM +0200, Sachin Shurpali (RBIN/DCA-NMP) wrote:
> Hi,
>     The addresses after shmat for two processes are coming different (of
> course) for the same ID. The size of shared memory is around 225 KB. Can
> somebody give me a clue , why it is so?  Surprisingly transfer  thro' the
> shared memory is proper. The difference in addresses is precisely 1 MB.

References:
- shared memory
  - From: Sachin Shurpali (RBIN/DCA-NMP)

Prev by Subject: Re: shared memory
Next by Subject: snmpset command help
Previous by thread: Re: shared memory
Next by thread: snmpset command help
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread