[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LI] Re : Modules

To: linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LI] Re : Modules
From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:35:40 -0800
In-reply-to: <2962A018DE14D211B8620000F80807F4010F6852@IE10-VSN.hiso.honeywell.com>; from Ajit, Kumar (IE10) on Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 11:34:19AM +0530
References: <2962A018DE14D211B8620000F80807F4010F6852@IE10-VSN.hiso.honeywell.com>
Reply-to: linux-india
Sender: owner-linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 11:34:19AM +0530, Ajit, Kumar   (IE10) wrote:

> Security doesn't mean thwart people from getting something, as SVR4 does.

Uncontrolled access to data structures from device drivers (which 
is what modules are mostly used for) leads to unmaintainable code.

	-Arun

--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.

References:
- [LI] Re : Modules
  - From: Ajit, Kumar (IE10)

Prev by Subject: [LI] Re : Modules
Next by Subject: RE: [LI] Re : Modules
Previous by thread: Re: [LI] More on modules
Next by thread: RE: [LI] Re : Modules
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread