[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LI] Threads

To: linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LI] Threads
From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 09:16:45 -0800
In-reply-to: <381E5312.47BAABAA@vsnl.com>; from Shourya Sarcar on Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:57:23PM -0500
References: <001401bf236e$47e92660$8873c5cb@alteffex> <381D34A8.69FD51C5@sol.net.in> <381E5312.47BAABAA@vsnl.com>
Reply-to: linux-india
Sender: owner-linux-india@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:57:23PM -0500, Shourya Sarcar wrote:
> Yup.. that was exactly the reason I was asking for some info on pthreads.
> However, the problem remains. Pthreads is not 100 % portable on all POSIX
> compliant systems.. there are POSIX compliant threading libraries but not
> 100% source code compliance can be achieved.

If 100% source code compliance was a requirement, there wouldn't be any
need for a standard. If you write code to the POSIX standard and take
it to any UNIX system and if it doesn't work, that means the pthreads
implementation on that system is not POSIX compliant.

	-Arun

--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available.  Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.

References:
- Re: [LI] Threads
  - From: Shourya Sarcar

Prev by Subject: Re: [LI] Threads
Next by Subject: [LI] Time lapse in X
Previous by thread: Re: [LI] Threads
Next by thread: RE: [LI] Can we look into IP packets throu
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread