Re: Re: [linux-delhi] [TROLL] License of messages sent to he list

[Saurabh Garg <saurabhgarg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Would everyone agree that a messages posted to the mailing list (LI,
> > LD, LIG, etc) is public property as long as credit is given to the
> > author?  In other words, can we implement some sort of relevant open
> > license on all messages posted to the mailing list by default?

	Yah, Yah, next time you'll want your mailbox to be licensed. I pay you for 
posting messages on your mailbox. And come to think of it, we'll even have 
licenses for surfing the web. Some type of,like I am licensed to use 
Netaddress , but not Yahoo. And then all these news sites would close down, 
as Only Gabbar Singh has the license for posting his dacoity news at 
www.gabbarsingh.com . 
	People, please go out for some time and get a breather. All this crap is 
taking us nowhere. As was rightly remarked by Mr. Raju Mathur, some people 
here speak more than they possibly shake their hands. All speak and no work 
makes *you* a dumb lister.
	Besides, I dont think the people here need due credit for calling some Linux 
proffessionals scumbags and then licensing these "creditable" crappy posts. 
Atleast some people are out there doing some real work, rather than sit in 
air-conditioned campus desktops and passing time by posting irrelevant and 
unwarranted threads. I dont think this silly licensing thread needs any more 
consideration. Even MS doesnt license words. Surely, Linux cant.
	Anyway, not many of us are worthy of even being quoted anyplace.

Regards,
Saurabh Garg
--
Keep your Windows shut to keep the bugs out.