[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sendmail vs Postfix

To: linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <mallet@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:18:10 +0530
In-reply-to: <20010312222904.A63605@sharmas.dhs.org>; from arun@sharmas.dhs.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:29:04PM -0800
Mail-followup-to: linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Hopelessly Disorganized
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010311222516.00a59d50@wheresmymailserver.com> <20010312222904.A63605@sharmas.dhs.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Arun Sharma rearranged electrons thusly:

> Some of you might want to check out the long discussions on *freebsd
> lists about sendmail/postfix/qmail, with crosspostings from a number
> of net.celebrities. Sendmail is tightly wedded to *bsd if you consider
> Kirk the father of *BSD :)
 
AFAIK, sendmail was _developed_ on BSD as well.

	-s

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian  <-->  mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin

References:
- Sendmail vs Postfix
  - From: Kiran Jonnalagadda
- Re: Sendmail vs Postfix
  - From: Arun Sharma

Prev by Subject: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix
Next by Subject: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix
Previous by thread: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix
Next by thread: LINK: Linux in the Indian Press / March 11
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread