[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: RedHat 7.0
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Sajeev Cholayil wrote:
> Sir/M'm,
> PC-Quest used to release the RedHat versions on CD, but why are they
> hesitant with version 7.0?
> Thank You,
> Sajeev
There are several reasons:
- RHL 7 was buggy as hell, and PCQ does not want to subject its users to
this. RHL 7.1 is on the way, but until it is out, we cannot judge it.
RedHat typically plays the Version Waltz (x.0, .1, .2 ;-), with .2
usually being the most usable/stable version. The most stable CD version
of RHL continues to be the RHL 6.2, which was distributed with PCQ June
2000.
- The PCQ Linux Project doesn't just push out Linux CDs. It tries to add
value. This takes time, and a stable version as a base *would* be nice.
If it was just a case of pushing out CDs, nothing would be gained over
someone getting a copy of raw RHL 7.x from a friend or for Rs.200 from
GTE or FreeOS.COM. This is not to downplay the value of these channels -
it is just that PCQ *likes* the concept of value-add for its readers.
- PCQ would like to minimize the impact of rapid version changes (which
are in no way unique to RHL), since it recognises that people who
install from its CDs typically tend to use it for a long time.
- The current stand is "no more Linux 2.2 based CDs". But 2.4.x has not
yet reached the stability required for distro vendors to push out a
"real" 2.4.x based distro.
- The PCQLP team builds its "offerings" based on reader suggestions and
feedback (to linux-project@xxxxxxxxxxx), plus a close watch on channels
like LI*. This takes time.
Atul
(Not speaking for or as PC Quest)
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Atul Chitnis | achitnis@xxxxxxxxxxx (PGP:6011BCB8)
Exocore Consulting | http://www.exocore.com
Bangalore, India | +91 (80) 3440397 Fax +91 (80) 3341137
----------------------------------------------------------