[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: Formal Member Registration
- To: linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Formal Member Registration
- From: Syed Khader Vali <sidgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 May 2000 09:05:05 +0530
- Copyright: Copyright 2000 Syed Khader Vali - All Rights Reserved
- Disclaimer: Not speaking for anyone in any way, shape, or form.
- In-reply-to: Atul Chitnis's message of "Mon, 29 May 2000 01:57:04 +0530 (IST)"
- Operating-system: Turing OS XCVII
- Organization: IBM Global Services - India
- Reply-to: sidgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Url: http://www.sidcarter.com/
>>>>> On Mon, 29 May 2000 01:57:04 +0530 (IST), Atul Chitnis <achitnis@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Atul> Khader: it would have helped had you attended the last meet
Atul> - a lot more things would have become clearer. Your fear of
Atul> "formality" is pretty ridiculous.
Well, Maybe I was wrong, depends on what we might be talking. I
seriously should have been there. I guess this was the first ILUG
meet which I missed in the past one year. :-( ( Kya kare once in a
while I have to meet my friends also :-) the whole intention is to
keep it informal and make it look formal. Is that possible ? I dunno.
Atul> Such huge numbers bring along their own problems - caterers
Atul> need to be told numbers *before* the event, sponsors would
Atul> like to have an idea of what they are dealing with and we
Atul> (the coordinators of the LUG) need to gauge the profile of
Atul> the members and what would interest them at meets.
But my only question here is what in case we have relatively more
number of walk-ins than members ? Then what do we tell the caterers or
whoever ?
Atul> At Bang!inux, we had no way of telling the organisers who
Atul> our members were and how they could be identified -
Atul> resulting in us not being able to arrange for LUG members to
Atul> attend some of the sessions.
Was there a chance like that ? Then I guess I will the first to
register :-)
Atul> Last year, at IT.COM, we also had no formal way of
Atul> identifying members, resulting in cheapskates trying to pass
Atul> themselves off as Linux India members in order to bypass the
Atul> gate-fee for the exhibition.
And one who were really volunteering had to wait for hours together
outside because there was no way of identification that they were
from the LUG ( which included me :-( So I guess again I will be first
for the membership in that case :-)
Atul> These are all logistical issues, and for those of you
Atul> merrily waving your little red flags - big numbers bring big
Atul> logistical problems, especially for organisers,
Atul> coordinators, etc.
I guess I will not talk much now as I am getting the answers :-)
Atul> For those of you who did not attend the meet - I proposed a
Atul> "membership fee" (actually just a payment for covering the
Atul> cost of printing membership cards) of Rs.10. Yes - that is
Atul> TEN Rupees, or about $0.25. One time. Period. Any "student"
Well, I guess then ravi can spend it "better " on ... now :-)
Thanks
Regards
- Khader
--
I used to have a life once, Now I have a Computer.
Syed Khader Vali (Siddiq) - Linux Guy, LCC
IBM Global Services , India
Work -- sidgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, skhader@xxxxxxxxxx
Play -- sid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Debian GNU/Linux ( Woody ) http://www.sidcarter.com