Re:

[Mrinal Kalakrishnan <mrinal@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Atul Chitnis typed:
> I vote for a default correct reply-to. And I do not agree with the
> philosophy of "reply-to is harmful". That is just one person's opinion.
> Before such an arbitrary rule is dumped on people, it would have been nice
> to ask the subscribers if they agree to it.

...And if "advanced" people have a clueful enough mailer, they can set
it to ignore the Reply-To field if the message is from a mailing list,
thus giving the feeling that Reply-To is not munged! :-)

-- 
Mrinal Kalakrishnan <mrinal@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.geocities.com/mrinal/
Linux 2.2.15 || PGP:B1E86F5B || Mutt 1.3.2i (2000-05-23) || VIM 5.5 
-- 
I still maintain the point that designing a monolithic kernel in 1991 is a
fundamental error.  Be thankful you are not my student.  You would not get a
high grade for such a design :-)
(Andrew Tanenbaum to Linus Torvalds)