Re: new list format

[Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <thaths@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Shanker R Swaminathan proclaimed:
> Why is the format of the message so different now?  The reply to filed now
> cointains the address of the original sender, so , whenever i try to reply
> from my mailer,  the address of the sender and NOT the list comes in the
> recipient  filed. IMHO the older format where we could reply to the list was
> better. 

Get a REAL MUA. ;-)

See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for info on why setting
'Reply-To' is considered to be bad.

I am assuming that people who subscribe to LIG are experienced users who
are clueful enough to reply to the group and edit the headers when
replying.  That is why LIG does not set the 'Reply-To'.

Thaths
-- 
         "Be patient, son.  A watched car never crashes."
                     -- Homer J. Simpson
Sudhakar C13n http://people.netscape.com/thaths/ Lead Indentured Slave