[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]

To: linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Dec 1999 16:04:28 -0600
In-reply-to: Nirmal Kejriwal's message of "Fri, 03 Dec 1999 02:53:40 +0530"
Mail-copies-to: never
Organization: The Debian Project
References: <4.2.0.58.19991203025216.03a8eb50@pop.netaddress.com>
Sender: owner-linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.4

>>"Nirmal" == Nirmal Kejriwal <nirmalkej@xxxxxxx> writes:

 Nirmal> Pushing reply to, sends a reply back to the original sender
 Nirmal> rather then the list, but I am sure you will have that fixed
 Nirmal> soon.

        This is expected behaviour. If you want to reply to the whole
 list most mail/news user agents provide a ``follow up'' command (as I
 did). 

        manoj
 wondering if posting works
-- 
 Biz is better.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
  - From: Sudhakar Chandrasekharan

References:
- Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
  - From: Nirmal Kejriwal

Prev by Subject: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
Next by Subject: Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
Previous by thread: Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
Next by thread: Re: [Administrative] Welcome to the reawakened LIG mailing list.]
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread