[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: Optimization in gcc

To: linux-india-programmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Optimization in gcc
From: "Madhu M. Kurup" <madhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 17:35:01 +0530
In-reply-to: <20001007172750.A2228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from binand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:27:50PM +0530
References: <005501c0304b$9d2c9900$6aaa09ca@gdr> <20001007165216.A6282@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20001007172750.A2228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Madhu M. Kurup" <madhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

Binand Raj S. encoded : 

>the simplest option, but -
>
>make CXXFLAGS+=-O2 x1
 
I don't even want to change from the 
	make <filename>
format! So, I'm looking at embedding optimization information into the code!

Cheerio,
M

   Madhu M Kurup /* Nemo Me Impune Lacessit */ madhu@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- fork-exec causes core-dump
  - From: Delip Rao
- Optimization in gcc
  - From: Madhu M. Kurup
- Re: Optimization in gcc
  - From: Binand Raj S.

Prev by Subject: Re: Optimization in gcc
Next by Subject: Re: Optimization in gcc
Previous by thread: Re: Optimization in gcc
Next by thread: Re: Optimization in gcc
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread