[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: shared memory

To: linux-india-programmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: shared memory
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:23:07 +0530
Organization: Persistent Systems Pvt. Ltd.
References: <DB9494CB877DD411BA0C00D0B73C6D24318B60@kormail3.ban.india.bosch.com>

Might be same physical memory area is mapped as two different virtual memory
areas. It's possible to mask actual memory address or provide memory address
translation. This is doen by hardware itself...

 Bye
  Shridhar

"Sachin Shurpali (RBIN/DCA-NMP)" wrote:

> Hi,
>     The addresses after shmat for two processes are coming different (of
> course) for the same ID. The size of shared memory is around 225 KB. Can
> somebody give me a clue , why it is so?  Surprisingly transfer  thro' the
> shared memory is proper. The difference in addresses is precisely 1 MB.

References:
- shared memory
  - From: Sachin Shurpali (RBIN/DCA-NMP)

Prev by Subject: shared memory
Next by Subject: Re: shared memory
Previous by thread: shared memory
Next by thread: Re: shared memory
Index(es):
- Subject
- Thread