[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LI] which is better
Does elm have IMAP support?
Kousik
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Sharad Joshi wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is not meant to start a bloody war, but just for information, which
> MUA is better, pine or elm. I do
>
> bash$ ls -l `which pine elm`
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 301588 Dec 12 1995 /usr/bin/elm
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 root bin 1188816 May 5 1999 /usr/bin/pine
>
> Ooops, pine is nearly 4 times in size than elm. Personally, i have always
> been using pine. Is there anything which pine provides, and elm does
> not? Or do i need to recompile my pine (but both already use the same
> libraries).
>
> bash$ ldd `which pine elm`
> /usr/bin/pine:
> libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8
> libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5.3.12
> /usr/bin/elm:
> libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8
> libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5.3.12
>
> Why is pine so memory thirsty?
>
> Sharad.
> -=-=-=-=-=-
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
> the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
> to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.