[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LI] MBR
- Subject: Re: [LI] MBR
- From: Manoj Victor Mathew <mvm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 22:47:24 +0530
Sumit Rangwala wrote:
>
> We know that if our MBR get corrupt we can rescue
> it using
> fdisk /mbr in dos
> What is the counter part of this in unix or Linux.
Re-install LILO!! It is that simple. (type 'lilo' as root to reinstall)
> And how this command rebuild the mbr info? Is there a copy of mbr elsewhere > on the disk?
Lilo writes a fresh copy of code to MBR. DOS fdisk /mbr does the same
job.
Yes, lilo keeps a backup copy (/boot/boot.NNNN). But lilo does not use
that while (re)installing the boot loader in MBR. It simple writes a new
one.
DOS fdisk cannot save you if you lose the partition table entries.
Whereas Linux fdisk at least gives you a chance to try and recreate the
partition entries to its previous values. If you succeed, you can rescue
your entire lost partition.
Conclusion: On all counts LILO is a better alternative to DOS fdisk
/mbr.
- --
Manoj Victor Mathew
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux in India visit http://www.linux-india.org/
The Linux India mailing list does not accept postings in HTML format.
------------------------------