Re: UltraSleek Mutt just got sleeker...

[Suresh Ramasubramanian <mallet@xxxxxxx>]

Mayuresh A Kathe rearranged electrons thusly:

> > compile mutt without support for pgp
> Not much of difference, earlier 787K, without PGP and IMAP 751k...
> It will also eliminate the need for pgp utils...
 
 You could compile mutt without a lot other features.

> What is the mutt_dotlock for?
> There was some option where "I" think it asked me I want that .dotlock 
> thing to be compiled in, do I go for it?
 
 Yes.  Definitely.  Take a look at man 1 mutt_dotlock please.
 
	-s
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian  <-->  mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin