[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [LIH] Linux or GNU/Linux? a philosophical problem
Arun Sharma proclaimed:
> [1] GNU utilities often get criticized for these reasons
> - Feature creep. cp -a is an example. find + tar + cp would be
> functionally equivalent and in keeping with the UNIX philosophy.
Didn't the SYSV folks criticize BSD of feature creep?
<Deja Vu>
Didn't we also discuss this in the past?
</Deja Vu>
> - Long command line options --foo etc. Some people think they are
> a waste of time and effort and contribute to bloat. If someone
> can't remember -f, it's likely that they won't remember --foo.
Believe it or not, I actually like the long getopts. It is easier to
remeber (but harder to type).
> - Lack of man pages. At one point, GNU had texinfo, but no man. Even
> today, the average foobar-0.9.tar.gz doesn't come with foobar.1.
> Compare that to the BSD world.
The documentation in info format is a pain in the ass. I agree with this
one.
Thaths
--
"Now, let's all turn around and pay attention to me again."
-- Homer J. Simpson
Sudhakar C13n http://www.aunet.org/thaths/ Lead Indentured Slave