[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LIH] Re :[OT] Hackers
- To: linux-india-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LIH] Re :[OT] Hackers
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Mar 2000 15:06:34 -0600
- In-reply-to: "Mukund Deshmukh"'s message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:10:24 +0530"
- Mail-copies-to: never
- Organization: The Debian Project
Hi,
>>"Mukund" == Mukund Deshmukh <betacomp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Mukund> I STRONGLY CONDEMN the kind of language of the mail, If some
Mukund> one is offered an root account on platter he can not be
Offered the root acount on a platter? The sysadmin came in and
said, here, that the root password, do as you wish? His UID was
changed to zero? He loggind in, and was presented with a root prompt?
Where my wife comes from, it is an open community, and no one
ever locks their doors. People trust that you would not violate the
trust, and even though the door is open, it does not mean people
wander through other peoples homes, just ``looking out of
curiousity''.
Failure to lock my door does not condone the person who
perfors an unauthoprized entry.
Mukund> called as cracker, I wonder why every one is shying away from
Mukund> this kind of stuff.
Because we are not thieves/
Mukund> I have been on this list for 2 years and found that 80% mail
Mukund> are related to display, sound and mail problem. And if some
Mukund> one opens with security a related topic, he is threatened to
Mukund> be thrown out.
He did not open a security related topic (BTW, I would be
interesested in discussing freeswan, IPSEC, CIPE, the SINUS firewall,
netfilter, mason, or any other security topic -- on the appropriate
list)
Mukund> Why ? Is the linux is limited to only display, sound and
Mukund> mail problem. I know there are many people on this list who
Mukund> are managing the important server, Do they know ?
Enough that we know that you should never let your store be
guided by a thieves advice alone.
Mukund> Why these are not discussed on this list because some will
Mukund> boot his as* from the list?
Please look at BugTraq, where these kinds of things are
discussed. I have no objection to disccussing uprades, security
fixes, etc, where the emphasis is on security, not on
cracking.
Mukund> So please do not discourage security related topics to this
Mukund> list even if they are posted by a hacker.
He is not a hacker. Seems more like a cracker wanna be
cracker exploits, so far. and talksing about how one broke into a
mismanaged server does not really help admins -- at that level of
isecurity, decent training is required.
Mukund> Most of the lister have an account on vsnl /dot server and
Mukund> any security related discussion can not be out context. I
Mukund> receive an average 10 kb a spam mail every day, just because
Mukund> server admin are not in position to maintain their server
Mukund> properly. I do not want some one peeking in to my mail box as
Mukund> it has mails from my overseas customer. If any discussion on
Mukund> this list is going help vsnl to set the things right, it will
Mukund> be beneficial to listers only.
How is a discussion on this list about details on how to crack
the server helping change things any?
Mukund> And Sibayan can not called as cracker if the root account of
Mukund> cl server is offered on platter to him. If you keep doors and
Mukund> lockers of your house open, and a burglar strikes, cops will
Mukund> blame you first. It is every ones duty to keep his house in
Mukund> order first and then blame others.
Strange, If that is true, Indian laws need a big overhaul. So
the basic idea is that people do not have morals, they are all
thieves, and you better lock down all valuables or else? Wonderful
society you envisage.
Mukund> Having said this, I am not afraid any one booting my as* from
Mukund> the list, because then list will confined to display, sound
Mukund> and mail problems, which certainly does not interest me.
Is this a promise? Are you leaving us? Truly? Thanks a lot,
then. Have a nice life.
manoj
tired of people who are only kept honest because they are too stupid
to bypass locks
--
It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not
hers. Spock, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C