[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debian folly?



On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 03:55:39PM +0530, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:27:55PM +0000, Pankaj Kaushal merrily said:
>> QT was not GPL orThe QT Licence is not respected by GNU.
>
>AFAIK, GNU doesn't respect *any* licence other than it's own. Doesn't
>that say a lot about it?
No uts not true GUN respects The apache, zope
and lot of other licences taht are on the same lines
GNU dosent say to do gpl it only asks the 4 freedom's


 
>
>- Sandip
>-- 
>-------------------------------------
>Sandip Bhattacharya 
>sandipb @ bigfoot.com
>http://www.sandipb.net
>-------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------------------------
>The mailing list archives are available at
>http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-delhi
---end quoted text---

-- 
I don't care where I sit as long as I get fed.
		-- Calvin Trillin
................................
 Pankaj Kaushal <pankaj@xxxxxxx>
 Proud to use GNU <www.gnu.org>